ocean acidification

Ocean acidification has been called the evil twin of global warming. Carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere is absorbed by ocean water, forming acid in the process. As a result, the acidity of the ocean has increased measurably in recent decades. More acidic oceans could have severe consequences for marine animals and plants, the ecosystems they build, and the economies they drive.

RECENT POSTS

Ocean acidification and the explosion of hockey sticks

flyzipper / flickr

You’ve heard about hockey sticks, right? No, not the actual wood and carbon-fiber things you use to push a puck around on the ice, although those are perfectly nice. What I’m referring to are graphs of the history of various climate factors that are shaped roughly like a hockey stick – a long, relatively flat line that suddenly takes a sharp upward turn around the turn of the 20th century.

The original hockey stick graph was one of global average temperatures over the past 1,000 years. The graph was popularized by Al Gore in his film An Inconvenient Truth, then demonized – along with one of its primary creators, Dr. Michael Mann – by the 2009 ClimateGate email affair. Since then, the hockey stick meme has stayed pretty dormant … until now.

Continue reading

Washington state invokes Clean Water Act for ocean acidification

willapalens / flickr

Oysters - particularly babies - are exquisitely sensitive to ocean acidification.

In the fall of 2010, the EPA issued a memo stating for the record that the Clean Water Act covers ocean acidification, as well as more traditional types of pollution. While widely hailed as an historic call to action, the memo was full of qualifiers and caveats. First and foremost, few states would be expected to have the data necessary to request an “impaired” listing. Perhaps more daunting, such a listing would trigger legal requirements for corrective action – essentially an impossible standard to meet since nothing a state could do on its own would even touch the global phenomenon of ocean acidification.

So was this just political grandstanding destined to go nowhere? Maybe not.

In their latest report to EPA, the state of Washington has listed Puget Sound as “waters of concern” based on the impact of ocean acidification on the local shellfish industry. That’s a strategy that takes advantage of a work-around explicitly mentioned in the memo – demonstrating biological or ecological impacts attributable to ocean acidification, rather than documenting the subtle and slow-moving chemical phenomenon itself. It will be interesting to see whether other states follow suit; it could prove more difficult in areas with less pristine waters facing multiple impacts.

But back to the listing, itself. As explained in a press release from the Center for Biological Diversity, it’s kind of a half-way move:

In its new assessment, Washington again declined to identify coastal waters as “impaired” by acidification — a classification that would have required steps to curb carbon pollution causing acidification. Instead, only Puget Sound was put on the “waters of concern” list, a less urgent category.

This listing may not match the urgency that shellfish growers in the area feel, but it does at least give the problem some official standing.

Fish may be more susceptible to acid oceans than thought

Mark Kasianowicz / Massachusetts State House Photographer

Massachusetts' 'sacred cod' may be hanging by a string, thanks to a legacy of overfishing and a future made uncertain by climate change.

As if a new assessment questioning the health of Gulf of Maine cod stocks weren’t enough bad news for New England’s fishermen, Nature News this week reports on two new studies that suggest fish may be more susceptible to climate change – particularly impacts on ocean chemistry – than previously thought.

It’s been obvious for some time that cod and other commercially important marine species are feeling the heat, literally. Surface water temperatures around New England have risen 2-4ºF in the past fifty years. Likewise, half of the three dozen marine species monitored by federal fishery scientists have shifted their distributions to match changing water temperatures. Most are moving northward and offshore, but others – like mackerel – have actually moved into shallower, near-shore waters.

The other carbon dioxide problem

Human-produced carbon dioxide emissions do more than raise ocean temperatures. They actually alter the fundamental chemistry of the ocean in a myriad of ways (scary thought, huh?). It all starts with one chemical reaction: water plus carbon dioxide makes carbonic acid. Add enough carbon dioxide, and the pH of the ocean starts to drop. So far we’ve added enough to shift the average pH of the ocean from 8.2 to 8.1 – a deceptively small numeric change that actually reflects a 30% increase in acidity. Thus, the term ‘ocean acidification.’

Continue reading

Ocean acidification threatens New Bedford’s revenues

Sifu Renka / Flickr

A dramatic increase in the price of sea scallops accounted for most of New Bedford's fishery revenue in 2010.

Apparently the word of the day is scallops. New Bedford has once again clinched the top spot among fishing ports, no thanks to declining fish landings. What has kept the Whaling City the highest-revenue port is the high price of scallops.

Just as I finished reading the New Bedford Standard Times article to that effect, this tweet came across my desk:

50% US fishery revenue comes from shell-forming mollusks and crustaceans. What impacts will OA have? (Doney #AFS2011)

Heather Galindo, of COMPASS (Communication Partnership for Science and the Sea), appears to be reporting on comments made by Scott Doney, a senior scientist here at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, at the annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society currently going on in Seattle.

For those not familiar with the shorthand, OA is ocean acidification – the shift in the ocean’s acid-base balance caused by rising levels of carbon dioxide absorbed from the atmosphere.

One of the most notable effects of ocean acidification is that it makes it difficult for animals like quahogs, scallops, and oysters to extract the calcium carbonate they need to build their shells. As acidity increases, shells get thinner and more defective, growth slows down, and death rates rise. And that’s in the lab, where diseases, pollution, and predators aren’t factors; death rates may be much higher for thin-shelled, chronically stressed shellfish living in the wild.

Scott Doney, along with research associate Sarah Cooley and other colleagues, has been working to answer the very question Doney posed this morning in Seattle: what are the biological and economic impacts of ocean acidification? Cooley and Doney have said that ocean acidification could reduce U.S. shellfish harvests by as much as a quarter over the next fifty years. Earlier this summer, Cooley and Doney published a comprehensive assessment of vulnerability of shellfish harvests worldwide to ocean acidification and identified likely ‘transition decades’ when water chemistry will no longer support current harvests and major declines will begin to be seen. For the U.S., they predict that will happen in less than two decades.

What will that mean for New Bedford? According to the NOAA, sea scallops accounted for 77% of the city’s $306 million in landings in 2010. That’s $235 million dollars. Reduce that by a quarter, and New Bedford loses almost $60 million dollars a year. That’s serious money.

State of the Ocean: Climate change driving oceanic mass extinction

flickr/Photo Extremist

If you thought my State of the Oceans report was scary, get this: An international panel of ocean experts known as the International Programme on the State of the Ocean has released a new report that says human activities are driving marine life extinct at an unprecedented and accelerating pace. No sugar coating there.

The group points to problems like pollution and overfishing, but says that rising levels of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel combustion pose the greatest risks. The State of the Ocean experts aren’t alone in their thinking; many scientists think the ocean is in the early stages of the sixth mass extinction – the first in the history of the Earth to be caused by humans.

Continue reading

The State of the Oceans 2011

flickr/epzibah

Welcome to World Oceans Day 2011. Since 2008, the United Nations has recognized June 8th as a day to celebrate, learn about, and take action on behalf of the oceans that cover three quarters of our planet and sustain all life on Earth – what author Julia Whitty calls our Deep Blue Home.

Last year at this time, oil was still spewing into the Gulf of Mexico from the mangled riser pipe of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig. All told, more than 4 million barrels of oil were spilled, and nearly 800,000 gallons of the chemical dispersant Correxit were injected deep into the Gulf. On the one-year anniversary of the explosion that killed eleven men and started what President Obama called “the greatest environmental disaster of its kind,” oil spill researcher Chris Reddy told me it was still too soon to know how much oil and dispersant remains in the Gulf and what the long-term ecological impacts will be.

U.S. Coast Guard

The Deepwater Horizon in flames.

This year, as we recognize World Oceans Day, we wait for news of another environmental disaster – the ongoing nuclear crisis in Japan. Yesterday, Japan’s nuclear agency doubled their estimate of how much radioactive material has been released from the Fukushima Daichi nuclear power plant that was crippled by the March 11th earthquake and tsunami. In the weeks immediately following the disaster, levels of radioactivity in surrounding ocean waters skyrocketed. Now Bloomberg has reported that radioactive water may once again begin flowing into the ocean as it overflows service trenches. The announcement adds to the urgency of a research expedition now underway to map the location, type, and levels of radioactive contamination in the Pacific Ocean.

And yet, despite their devastating effects, these dramatic environmental disasters are not the greatest threats to our ocean.

Studies released in the past year have trumpeted dire news: nearly 60% of the world’s coral reefs are at risk of being lost in the next three decades, 85% of natural oyster reefs have already been lost, and it’s estimated that large fish have declined by two-thirds in the past century. These declines are largely the result of five human-driven processes that slowly but surely chip away at ocean ecosystems.

1. Climate Change: The ocean has absorbed more than 90% of the excess heat trapped by rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Rising water temperatures are driving commercially important fish species offshore and toward the poles in search of cooler climes – bad news for fishermen and seafood lovers alike. Warmer water also holds less oxygen, and that spells trouble for marine animals who – like us – breathe oxygen. Scientists recently warned that low-oxygen ‘dead zones’ are expanding, and that we could be in for a repeat of the mass extinctions triggered by prehistoric warming events.

flickr/freefotouk

Carbon dioxide emissions pose a double threat to the ocean, raising water temperatures and increasing acidity.

2. Ocean Acidification: Carbon dioxide doesn’t just build up in the atmosphere; about a third of it gets absorbed by the ocean. The inevitable chemical result is the production of carbonic acid that, in sufficient quantities, disrupts the acid-base balance of the ocean (thus, the term ‘acidification’). That, in turn, throws off a whole host of other chemical processes. Corals and shellfish can’t get the calcium carbonate they need for their skeletons and shells. And the microscopic marine plants upon which the entire ocean food chain depends may not be able to get the nutrients they need to grow. Scientists have generally considered ocean acidification to be a problem of the future, but a study published last fall forced a revision of that thinking by demonstrating that scallops and quahogs are already feeling the burn.

3. Pollution: Plastic, nutrients, pesticides, hormones, oil. The list of things we dump into the oceans is disconcertingly long. Last summer, a team of researchers from Woods Hole, MA, confirmed what many had long suspected – that plastic debris is accumulating in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, just as we’ve known for decades that it does in the Pacific. Another recent study confirmed that the vast majority of plastic releases estrogenic chemicals when soaked in saltwater and exposed to sunlight.

The greatest threat facing the ocean is our limited ability to see what’s beneath the surface, to truly grasp our impact on the vast expanses of ocean.

But not all pollutants are chemicals. Some experts include ‘biological pollution’, or invasive species – plants and animals that are introduced by human activities, like global shipping, into areas they have never been before. These species often out-compete or outright kill native species. This year, we learned that rising water temperatures may be making a bad situation worse, giving invasive species a competitive edge over their native counterparts.

4. Overfishing: Ecosystems are like jigsaw puzzles: remove one piece and you can’t complete the puzzle. Remove several, and the puzzle may not hold together or form a recognizable image. In this way, overfishing and its cousin, by-catch, wreak havoc on ocean ecosystems. Of course, collapsed fisheries take a human toll as well, causing economic hardship and threatening food supplies.

Counting fish is no easy matter, and there is always controversy about the status of fish populations. This year was no different. A high-profile presentation at a high-profile scientific conference set off a renewed debate, with one side claiming that large, predatory fish could be virtually extinct by 2050 and the other arguing that the reductions in large fish are exactly what would be expected of well-managed fisheries. But scientists on both sides of the overfishing debate have agreed that more than half of fish populations worldwide need rebuilding.

flickr/Laszlo Ilyes

Still, there’s some good news on the overfishing front today. Federal officials are optimistic that the 2010 fishing season may go down in history as the year U.S. fisheries set – and stayed within – science-based, sustainable fishing limits. The U.S. is just one country, but this is evidence that we have the tools necessary to end overfishing. The challenge is putting them to work in the places – like Asia – that need them most.

5. Ignorance: Less than 10% of the ocean has been explored by humans. We have better maps of Mars than the seafloor, and some oceanographers have compared their research to shining a flashlight into an immense, dark cavern. Last fall, scientists announced the completion of the Census of Marine Life – a decade-long, global effort to shine a light on the amazing diversity of life that inhabits the ocean. The efforts of more than 2,000 scientists raised the total number of known marine species to almost a quarter of a million. Still, they estimate that’s less than a quarter of what’s out there; the vast majority of ocean life remains unknown to science. That means that, even for the ocean scientists who know the most, the ocean is largely a big blue bag of mysteries. Susan Avery – Director of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution – says that the greatest threat facing the ocean is our limited ability to see what’s beneath the surface, to truly grasp our impact on the vast expanses of ocean.

Lest you think this doom and gloom doesn’t affect you, let me remind you of a few key facts.

It is no exaggeration to say that the ocean sustains all life on Earth. To quote W.H. Auden: “Thousands have lived without love, not one without water.” The oceans contain 97% of all water on the planet and drives the global water cycle. We’d also be hard-pressed to live without air, and microscopic marine plants produce more than half the oxygen we breathe.

Almost half of the world’s species live in the ocean. That rich biodiversity is not only an ecological wonder, it’s a treasure trove of chemicals that show up in everything from ice cream to toothpaste, and could hold a cure for cancer.

And in the age of globalization, when what you’re wearing, eating, or driving is more likely to be made in China than made in the U.S.A., it’s worth remembering that more than 90% of international trading is conducted via the ocean.

Just as we all benefit from the ocean, we all contribute to the threats facing the ocean, and we can all do something to help.

The greatest threats facing the ocean start in our homes and workplaces, whether we’re five minutes or 500 miles from the beach. While beach clean-ups are a tried and true way to repair some of the damage we inflict, they’re far from the only way.

  • Learn more about what the ocean does for us, and what we’re doing to it.
  • Tell others what you’re learning.
  • Eat fish responsibly: Buy local, if possible, and know how the fish you eat was caught. Look for the Marine Stewardship Council label or check with a consumer guide, like Seafood Watch or the Smart Seafood Guide. None of the guides or labels are perfect, but they’re better than nothing.
  • Ditch disposable plastic: We may only use it once, but it stays in the ocean forever. Plastic shopping bags and water bottles are particularly egregious offenders. Invest in a reusable water bottle and some canvas shopping bags.
  • Reduce your carbon footprint: Don’t know where to start? Try an online carbon footprint calculator or a home energy audit to pinpoint areas where you can reduce.

Ocean acidification confuses clownfish

flickr/sarniebill1

Okay, search your memory here. Remember ocean acidification? It’s been a while, but as you may recall, ocean acidification is the phenomenon in which carbon dioxide from the atmosphere dissolves in the surface waters of the ocean, producing carbonic acid that (in sufficient quantities) shifts the pH balance of the ocean toward acidity. In the past 200 years, the ocean has absorbed nearly a third of carbon dioxide emissions, resulting in a 30% increase in ocean acidity.

The extra acidity impairs the ability of animals like oysters and corals to extract the calcium carbonate they need to build their skeletons or shells. And there’s evidence that ocean acidification is already impacting the health and survival of bay scallops and other shellfish.

But get this: a new study published in the journal Biology Letters suggests that ocean acidification may affect basic life-saving behaviors in fish.

WHAT WE KNOW and HOW WE KNOW IT

The researchers at University of Bristol raised clownfish in modern seawater (390 ppm CO2) and in seawater enriched with carbon dioxide (600-900 ppm CO2). The elevated carbon dioxide situations mimicked levels expected by mid- to late-century if greenhouse gas emissions continue to grow at the current rate.

At the point when juvenile clownfish would normally be choosing a coral reef to settle down on, the researchers played recordings of a busy, predator-filled reef during the day – normally a big turn-off for small fish in the market for a home – and then watched whether the young fish swam away from the speaker. As expected, fish reared in modern-day water showed a strong inclination to get away from the threatening sound. But fish reared in any of the elevated carbon dioxide conditions did not; they spent more than twice as much of their time at the end of the fish tank closest to the speaker.

WHAT WE DON’T KNOW

The results of the experiment were pretty clear-cut, but there’s nothing in this study to explain why the fish failed to respond to the threatening sounds as expected. The researchers didn’t see any major changes in the ear bones of the fish, so speculate that it’s more likely changes in how the brain processes or responds to sounds than an actual change in hearing capabilities. But that’s only speculation at this point.

Also, this is just one study of one species of fish. We have no idea how widespread this type of response might be. Maybe it’s all fish. Maybe it’s just clownfish.

WHAT IT MEANS

As with many laboratory studies of the impacts of ocean acidification, the real-world implications are hard to know. But failing to avoid predators could have drastic consequences (we’ve all seen those nature shows, right?). Lead author Dr Steve Simpson of the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Bristol says the concern is whether fish will be able to adapt to increasingly acidic waters quickly enough to avoid worst-case scenarios.

“What we have done here is to put today’s fish in tomorrow’s environment, and the effects are potentially devastating. What we don’t know is whether, in the next few generations, fish can adapt and tolerate ocean acidification. This is a one-way experiment on a global scale, and predicting the outcomes and interactions is a major challenge for the scientific community.”

UPDATED: A lot of media reports about this study have been saying that ocean acidification leaves clownfish deaf. I just want to be absolutely clear that that is not what the study says. The authors stress that they do not know why the clownfish don’t respond to the threatening sounds, but they suspect it might be due to a change in neural function – how messages about the sound are transmitted to or processed by the brain – brought about by disrupted acid-base balance in the fish. In other words, nerves and brain might be the culprits rather than the ear.

Lobsters need more cod, less carbon dioxide

National Fisherman’s Melissa Woods has a straightforward, on-the-ground (or rather, on-the-sea) perspective on the complex interactions between overfishing and ocean acidification caused by the ocean absorbing increasing amounts of carbon dioxide:

Greater amounts of CO2 have created an imbalance in the ocean: more acid and less limestone, which is a critical building block for coral reefs and shellfish.

How bad is more acid? If the trend continues, increased acid in the oceans could cause flatlining of shellfish species in some areas, especially in colder waters like those in the Gulf of Maine and Alaska. The acid levels could also critically damage reefs and petite pteropods —part of the foundation of the ocean food chain. These events could happen in our lifetime.

flickr/clarkmaxwell

Right now, Maine has its own imbalance problem. In 2010, Maine enjoyed a record-breaking lobster harvest, and currently shellfish account for 90 percent of Maine’s wild harvested species.

That’s not exactly bad news, but acidic waters are bad for shellfish. They need limestone for their shells (the amount a lobster has is the difference between a shedder and a hardshell lobster). As scary as this is to think about, Steneck also said the lobster’s hyper-abundance combined with acidification may be putting them at a greater risk for a shell disease similar to the one that hit Long Island Sound’s lobsters in 1998.

Just one quick point to add here: how ocean acidification will impact lobster shell growth, specifically, is still a bit of a grey area. But acidification isn’t the only possible climate-change-related culprit in the dire condition of lobsters in Long Island Sound, and more generally, south of Cape Cod. Continue reading