24 Turbines – Anywhere But Here

Source: Cape Cod Commission

This map created by the Cape Cod Commission shows where wind turbines can and cannot be sited around Cape Cod.

On August 3, the Cape Cod Commission (CCC) will lift a moratorium on wind energy development in state waters off Cape Cod. The map shows where two-dozen turbines can and cannot be located.

The Process

The CCC convened a Policy Committee composed of a selectman from each of the Cape’s 15 towns. They were essentially given a map and asked to color within the lines. The CCC hoped this would give every town a voice in the process.

The moratorium gave the CCC 15 months to determine rules and restricted areas for coastal turbine siting. In 2009, the state’s Ocean Management Plan allocated 24 coastal turbines to the Cape, and the map above shows where those turbines can go.

While the regulation passed the CCC last week, it still needs to pass a vote with the Assembly of Delegates to be official. But as of now here’s what this map means.

Prohibited Areas at a Glance

A quick look at the map reveals that a lot of space is off the table. Everything in the green boundary is within the CCC’s jurisdiction. So where did all the red come from?

The entire Cape has a two-mile turbine buffer intended to protect recreational uses. This buffer was extended on the eastern Cape (from Provincetown to the islands south of Chatham) to protect the Cape Cod Ocean Sanctuary. All of Buzzards Bay and most of Cape Cod Bay are off limits because of sensitive species (endangered Roseate Terns and critically endangered North Atlantic Right Whales, respectively.) You may notice there are no markings within 1500 feet of shore; that area is not within the CCC’s jurisdiction, so turbines proposed there would be subject to local municipalities.

Prohibited vs. Excluded

Note the difference between “Prohibited” and “Exclusionary Areas.”

Prohibited means “no,” now and forever.

Exclusionary means “maybe,” so long as developer can prove right whales have not been there in the past five years.

That leaves a couple chunks of ocean in Cape Cod Bay, and a big swath of water in Nantucket Sound. While 24 big turbines could all fit within the limited waters in the bay, most of the real estate is in Nantucket Sound. Interestingly, this swath of sea borders the proposed home of Cape Wind – an industrial wind farm that will be home to 130 turbines.

What This Does Not Mean

There are no proposed turbines in these waters yet, and legally all future proposals must come from towns (or some municipal-private partnership). Towns like Truro, which do not border any water where turbines would be allowed, could join an electricity cooperative with neighboring communities. Also, this says nothing about turbine size: We could see 24 660-kilowatt turbines, 24 1.5-megawatt turbines, or they could all be varying sizes. All the turbines could be in one spot, or they could be scattered around the seascape. Until a project is proposed, there’s no saying what it will look like.

Paul Niedzwiecki, the CCC’s Executive Director, says the proposed rules contain minimum performance standards to protect eelgrass, fish stocks, view sheds, and other resources that you cannot draw a boundary around.

“I think there will be an appropriate level of concern,” Niedzwiecki says, “that more of Nantucket sound is not subject to the kinds of protections that could be reflected on the map. But I would direct all of those towns toward the minimum performance standards, which I think do provide a much better process and much better local protection than the Cape Wind process did.”

Basically, these regulations provide a framework for siting turbines in the Cape’s near shore waters. Whether or not the Assembly of Delegates approves the regulations, the moratorium on development will end on August 3.

 

  • Fido43

    Whales need protection from Wind Turbines?????????

  • Bbetolino910

    Whales need protection from the Japanese, Icelanders,and Norwegians who all ignore international moratorium on the hunting of Whales!  Wind turbines, offshore, would provide a De facto wildlife refuge ships will be forced to slow or be completely excluded from navigating  around the turbines.  The turbines whether they are attached to the ocean or  float anchored to the ocean will act just like off shore oil rig meaning,  they will provide  reefs and fisheries increasing biomass lets face it Fisherman are over fishing the seas and Massachusetts residence continue to build houses close to the shore pouring Chem lawn, sewage, and waste destoying the coast where do  you think the baby fish you eat are born they won’t survive if you develop the entire coast which is why fish populations are declining now.   The economic boom could be developed why don’t you propose aqua culture you could farm scallops and clams and oysters around the turbines. Back to the whales   just like the birds are smart enough to not swim or fly into the Turbines.  The Low frequency vibration  which are so devistating to residents in Falmouth who are 2000 feet or less from their poorly sited turbines would have a different affect on Fish.  In Journal of Applied ecology 2009 the authors argue in their article Marine renewable energy: potential benefits to Biodiversity demonstrate that Fish are attracted to the vibrations once again allowing if fishermen and shipping are restricted from overfishing or excluded you have a de facto wildlife refuge.  We could just continue to stip mine and build a perfectly good clean coal fired or natural gas power plant in your back yard.   For all of you tree hugging, elitist, unionized Dem’s in DemocratistanThe high power transmission lines already are running under the ocean that is how you all get power on the Vineyard! Wake up it is a nation security issue as well as environmental. I am not even suggesting wind how about wave energy converters.  New Jersey and delaware are moving forward with wind turbines and the Right Whales live off shore their still  turbines will provide the whales protection from shipping. How many still swim into buzzards Bay?

  • Anonymous

    A pet peeve:  Why isn’t a scale part of the map?  And where’s the north arrow and title?
    Whoever is responsible for this map needs to go back to school to learn the basics of putting a good map together.  Geesh.

    Now to the wind turbine issues.  *How come birds migration patterns are not addressed?  This was a major concern in PA; evidence of impacts to raptors and bats (who are already suffering from White Nose Syndrome) was presented earlier this year by PA Game Commission. *Of course noise is an issue; sound travels, remember?  Who has really not heard about whale songs and the detremental effects of sonar on whales?  *Artificial reefs are a good thing.  *What are the regulations concerning wind turbines and Environmental Impact Statements?  *Do the installers of the wind turbines need to provide an Alternatives Analysis before they can proceed with siting each turbine?  And if not, why not?