The Falmouth Experience: Sick From The Noise

Some residents of Falmouth say they’re feeling sick from the sounds coming from a large, town-owned wind turbine. While turbines are not silent, those claims are often controversial. In the second installment of our series, The Falmouth Experience: The Trouble With One Town’s Turbine, Sean Corcoran reports on the residents complaints and what science says about their claims.


Wind One is seen in Falmouth, Mass. Some residents who live nearby say the noise of the turbine is causing them health problems.

Jess Bidgood/WGBH

Wind One (foreground) is seen in Falmouth, Mass. Some residents who live nearby say the noise of the turbine is causing them health problems.

FALMOUTH, Mass. — Last September, under the cover of darkness, Barry Funfar set out on an act of civil disobedience. His target was a wind turbine the town installed about 1,600 feet from his Falmouth home. Funfar used sticky-backed letters and a large poster-board to vandalize a welcome sign near the turbine’s base. When he was done, the new sign read, “The Noise from This Turbine is Killing Me.” And the word “killing” was in red, and he signed his name with a thick black marker.

“I had this huge foam board and covered the whole thing. I used gorilla tape to make it hard to take off. I figured the police would be up to my house the next morning or something. But I heard nothing,” Funfar said.

Dozens of people living near the 1.65-megawatt turbine have reported sleep interruptions, headaches and vertigo since it was turned on last April. Neighbors say it’s like sea sickness — some people feel it, others don’t. But the effects seem to be cumulative in that symptoms appear and increase the longer they’re near the turbine.

What’s not clear is why. A town-commissioned sound study concluded the turbine produces broad spectrum sound at levels within town and state guidelines. But residents say it’s not the volume as much as the type of sound that’s the problem.

The Anderson family logged feelings of sadness and anger, which they chalk up to the presence of the turbines.

Jess Bidgood/WGBH

The Andersen family logged feelings of sadness and anger, which they chalk up to the presence of the turbines.

“I’ve learned it’s just a different kind of noise. It’s like it gets inside of me and just causes so much stress and anxiety that even when it isn’t going I have this fear of when it is going to start up again,” Funfar said.

Residents primarily report three different types of turbine noise (all of which we were unable to record on our visits to the turbine). The first and most easily understood noise is a swooshing sound that’s made at regular intervals when the blades spin. Then, there’s another, more erratic sound, which some compare to a sneaker bouncing around in a drier.

Heather Goldstone says both of those noises are called impulse sounds, which scientists know are harder to get used to than constant sounds. But for reasons scientists don’t understand, wind turbine noise seems to be more disturbing than other noises such as airports and highways.

“Many scientists and wind-energy advocates say that while people may become annoyed by turbine noise, annoyance is not considered a health impact from a clinical perspective. That said, chronic annoyance can build into stress, and stress could cause many of the symptoms people are complaining about,” Goldstone.

Goldstone cited the work of Dr. Michael Nissenbaum, a physician who has studied the impacts of two wind farms in Maine on nearby residents. “He told me he thinks there’s a more direct explanation: That sleep deprivation caused by turbine noise is taking a toll on people’s mental and physical health,” she said.

The residents who report being the most severely affected by Wind One blame low-frequency sound, often called infrasound, that is inaudible and controversial. They say it’s like a pulse that gets into their heads and makes their hearts race.

“People have different sensitivities to sound, particularly in the low-frequency range,” Goldstone says. “The question is whether sounds below a person’s hearing threshold can affect the ear in other ways and possibly lead to health impacts. Conventional wisdom says no, but a couple of recent studies say maybe. There’s just not enough science available to sort this out yet.”

Steven Clarke is the top wind expert in Governor Patrick’s administration. Clarke says he won’t downplay residents’ complaints. But it’s important to recognize that Falmouth is only one out of 26 turbines that have been installed in Massachusetts, including a half-dozen turbines similar in size and capacity to Wind One.

“Once you put that context around the Falmouth situation,” he says, “I think it becomes clear that we should look at this as a specific case and not generalize that wind energy in general is problematic.”

State leaders have heard complaints about the lack of science as town boards make decisions, and Clarke says the state is looking to partner with a scientific institution to further study turbine noise.

More from this series:

  • MJ

    The word annoyance is often misinterpreted by the general public, and apparently Ms. Goldstone, as a feeling brought about by the presence of a minor irritant. Ms. Goldstone seems unaware that in the medical usage it exists as a precise technical term and defines annoyance as a mental state capable of degrading health.

    Suter (1991) presents a formal definition of annoyance:

    “Annoyance has been the term used to describe the community’s collective
    feelings about noise ever since the early noise surveys in the 1950s and 1960s,
    although some have suggested that this term tends to minimize the impact. While
    “aversion” or “distress” might be more appropriate descriptors, their use would
    make comparisons to previous research difficult. It should be clear, however, that
    annoyance can connote more than a slight irritation; it can mean a significant
    degradation in the quality of life. This represents a degradation of health in accordance with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of health, meaning total physical and mental well-being, as well as the absence of disease.”

  • Cant-hear-it

    The best part of the NPR radio story is (interestingly) left out of the text version… where they mention that NONE of the sounds could be recorded for the story! Funny how only a few neighbors can hear this stuff. The NPR microphones can’t pick it up, and the Town’s noise study can’t either. A huge noise problem that can’t be heard.. How do you spell “exaggeration”?

  • MJ

    Cant-hear-it.. Yea, it’s like blowing out your knee (torn ACL) and going to the doctor. He takes an X-ray… sees nothing and sends you home (still in pain) with some Advil. You get home, racked with pain, and wonder why he didn’t suggest a MRI to see the damage. The x-ray wasn’t the right tool for diagnosis!

  • MJ

    Steven Clark – the top wind expert in Governor Patrick’s administration – deflects from the issue by citing 26 turbines that have been installed in Massachusetts, including a half-dozen turbines similar in size and capacity to Wind One. Why doesn’t he cite the problematic issues with similar sized turbines in WI -USA, Ontario, Germany or Great Britain? Keeping the sample pool to a minimum may increase the value of the marketing measure, but does little to embrace an acknowledgment that Falmouth is clearly not unique.

  • JFR

    How do you spell “uninformed” and “callous” ?

    The sound from the turbine comes and goes with the velocity and direction of the wind, making that randomness all the more difficult to endure.

    The town’s acoustic study uses inadequate standards developed in the 70′s, long before industrial wind turbines became part of the American landscape.

    Why not try living on Blacksmith Shop Rd, Falmouth?
    Or at least visit for awhile ?

  • SilentKnight

    “Three different types of turbine noise (all of which we were unable to record on our visits to the turbine)”….. Lemme get this straight – they produced a whole series of radio shows but were UNABLE TO RECORD the noise? Hello? Anyone smell a contradiction here?

    Stay tuned for next week’s big story: pictures of an invisible object…

  • Lisa

    We live within three quarters of a mile of the THREE wind turbines on Vinalhaven in Maine. We have the exact same problem in Vinalhaven ( see http://www.fiwn.org) that some residents do not believe how the wind turbines have impacted our quality of life and our health. Some neighbors are not as sensitive to the noise as others (or must have music or television on which would help to drown out the sound). Some of these people do not understand or want to understand how turbine noise can impact others. Instead, they accuse those of us who are suffering from the impact of turbine noise of lying. It is a very sad situation in the Vinalhaven community and one that could have been avoided if the turbines had been sited responsibly. As is, those of us who are sensitive to noise have had our lives turned upside down and are also blamed for the problem! I wish the best of luck to the wind turbine neighbors in Falmouth. I am very glad to hear that rather than being called “naysaysers” their community is beginning to reach out to them and is looking for some real solutions. People should not be expected to live under these kinds of conditions. The state needs to step in and help to resolve the grave injustice of siting the wind turbine too close to homes.

  • Chris Kapsambelis

    I am convinced that the reason Falmouth has become a prominent site for wind turbine noise complaints is Amplitude Modulation (AM).

    http://acousticecology.org/docs/AEI_WindFarmNoise_2009inReview.pdf

    “An interesting finding in one recent detailed recording study was that while the noise levels were lower to the side, the AM was only noticeable there25; this makes me wonder whether one reason that AM is troublesome is that it may occur in zones where the turbines are otherwise largely imperceptible.”

    In Falmouth the strongest winds are from the Southwest and Northeast. The complaints seem to come from people living to the Southeast and Northwest of the turbine (right angles to the wind direction). This tends to confirm the results of the above study that found AM most noticeable to the side of the turbine, not directly downwind.

    Two post installation studies were done by Falmouth and by the residents. The state standard for compliance is no more that 10dBA above ambient. Even though the standard does not specify, the Town study used the L90 metric to measure sound for both the turbine ON and OFF sound levels, and found the turbine in compliance.

    From the above study, the AM sound is prominent on the side of the turbine. The Town study completely failed to take AM into account. As you might know the L90 metric cannot register 90% of the AM component. The residents’ study, which was limited to only a couple of measurement samples, did in fact show that AM was present at a level of about 4 dBA peak to peak.

    With limited sampling, the 4 dBA of AM is not the worst case occurrence. It is entirely possible that worst case might be 10dBA or more, making the AM sound audible enough to explain the large number of complaints. Furthermore, this particular pattern of prevailing wind and resident locations to the side of wind direction, may not apply to other locations, like Hull, whose residents have not registered any complaints.

    Chris Kapsambelis

  • NoFreeWind

    MassDEP is charged with the responsibility of investigating noise complaints.

    Why is MassDEP avoiding the Falmouth noise complants of more that 50 people?

  • Heather Goldstone

    Just a point to keep in mind: the ONLY homes with half a mile of the turbine are to the south and west … so, of course that’s where complaints are coming from.

  • Heather Goldstone

    Sean’s decision not to include the sound was actually a deliberate choice made to avoid exaggeration. To be sure, we are talking about fairly low sound levels in terms of total decibels. In order to get high-quality recordings and make them clearly audible on the radio, he would have had to turn up the gain on his microphone. As he said to me, he thought that would be disingenuous. While I very much sympathize with the desire to experience the sound for oneself, I tend to agree with him.

  • Chris Kapsambelis

    Good point Heather. However, the AM sound generated by the tips of the blades traveling close to 200 mph, and spreading the sound sideways to the wind direction may explain why certain installations appear to be noise free while others, like Falmouth, and Vinalhaven, ME produce objectionable sound at quite some distance from the turbine.

    It also appears that standing down wind and close to the turbine maybe a “quiet spot” since the wind velocity at ground level is considerably less than at hub level and above. This could explain why casual observers report that turbine noise, even close up does not seem that bad.

    One would have to recreate the exact conditions of wind speed and direction to determine the severity of the noise. I do not believe anyone has done that. The study commissioned by Falmouth was over a ten day period where the wind was relatively light and direction was not even considered. Furthermore, the instrumentation used was incapable of measuring the level of any pulsating AM sound.

    The study needs to be redone with more realistic requirements as to what is to be measured, and what methodology will be used to capture the data.

  • Birdman12

    “To be sure, we are talking about fairly low sound levels in terms of total decibels. In order to get high-quality recordings and make them clearly audible on the radio, he would have had to turn up the gain on his microphone.”

    This point, buried deep in the comments, deserves to be front-and-center.

  • suehobart

    Lisa, We sited your studies and got listened to last night at the Board of Health… please keep talking if you can stomache it… we now have a facebook site …falmouth turbine neighbors.
    I am you in Falmouth… thanks for chiming in.. take care as well!

  • suehobart

    you’re a fool..ACTUALLY READ the research before you pipe up silentking…

  • suehobart

    studies that average sound in the limited time period it was taken…
    OK , by that standard the ocean never has waves over 3 feet

    But ignorance is bliss, so those that need to make those kind of comments go forth and be blissful. Unfortunately some of us can’t … we have to defend our health and lives.

  • suehobart

    Ms Goldstone you are my hero.. as is NPR… thank you thank you thank you for putting this complex issue into a more understandable report.
    Getting this information out has been so hard up til now.

  • suehobart

    easy… they want to spend the money they have for it and get their green state merit badge from the FEDS..
    They got a goal so who gives a rip about the people.